Let’s begin with something I forgot when I built my guardians: wash the sprues!
I put my Wych sprues and bases into the sink with some warm soapy water and gave them a light scrub with an old toothbrush.
I hear that cleaning sprues helps ensure that you have gotten rid of any chemicals that might interfere with your painting. The story I’ve heard around the internet and most notably in a GW published book called How to Paint Citadel Miniatures, when sprues are made the molds get covered in something called “mold release agent.” This agent helps prevent the sprues from sticking to the molds so that they can be removed from the molds and boxed for people to buy. The mold release agent can also prevent paint from sticking to plastic properly.
Despite never having washed sprues when I built models 15 years ago, I never noticed any issues with my paint that might have been the doing of mold release agent. And yet I figure why not take all the proper measures I can, especially since cleaning a whole sprue doesn’t take too long. For what it’s worth I didn’t paint a ton of models back then anyways so maybe it was just a matter of time until my lack of sprue washing came to bite me in the tail.
Speaking of these bases though, it confused me to see that these bases that came with the wyches were… inferior to my 15 year old bases???
The Wych base is on top and my old base is on the bottom.
As you can see the Wych base – and they all are like this – comes with a dent in the middle of it. And in that dent is a nub where I presume the plastic got poured into the mold.
In my investigation of these differences I noticed that the bottoms of my two styles of bases had different copyright dates:
The Wych base is on top and dated “2005,” whereas the bottom base is dated “1992.”
The biggest difference I see here is how each base got made. The ’92 bases came in sets of four on these “X” shaped mini sprues, as pictured here, except this sprue has two of the bases broken off:
Even if you didn’t use a knife or clipper you can twist these things and the bases will eventually pop off the sprue.
Now for people anal about the presentation of their models, I can see why this design might bother them. I have noticed in my time perusing stores with Citadel mini displays and looking through online pictures that while many people like to glue sand, mini grass, and dirt to the tops of their bases, the overwhelming majority of people seem to like the sides of their bases clean. That means a sprue scar on the edge can’t so easily get covered up the way a scar on the top of the base could with the way bases get conventionally done up. If you file or cut off the sprue nub on the ’92 style bases, you probably won’t get your base to have a perfectly circular bottom unless you mess around with putty to fill in the scar and have a deft hand at putty sculpting.
The scar on top 2005 design I think leads to an uglier base right out of the box, but a nicer base than the ’92 design when you put extra base texture ontop of both. In that sense I can see the appeal of the 2005 model.
But the 2005 slot bases I find need trimming at the middle before a model can even fit into the slot, making it more a of a pain for casual modelers than the ’92 base. For someone who doesn’t care about sprucing up their base tops and having perfectly circular base bottoms, the 2005 bases take some knife/clipper work just to be usable where the ’92 bases took none.
So whether one design is better or not comes down I think to the wants of the model owner. The 2005 model seems to favor the artist who likes to make his models look ready for a display case. And the 1992 models seems to favor the guy who could give a crap about fancy basing techniques and just wants to play a game of Warhammer with unpainted models (and a collective gasp could be heard as a chorus of Warhammer snobs bristled at the very suggestion that someone make a habit of playing with unpainted minis).
Since the artist types probably care more about the bases than the unpainted model gamers anyways, I can see why GW would cater to their wants at this crossroads. Plus I think GW enjoys the free marketing they get from people posting awesomely painted GW minis on the internet.
So having thought through this dilemma I have arrived at the opinion that the 2005 bases are better than the 1992 bases. Goes to show why you can’t always trust your kneejerk reactions.
But having done so much knifework these last few days on these bases and on models, I want to keep my knife sharp to avoid injury. I hope anyone who uses a knife knows that a dull blade can be more dangerous than a sharp one. Where a sharp blade might make an even, smooth cut, a dull blade might cut uneven and might need so much pressure put on it to make a cut that once it gets through whatever you were cutting it might go flying and hit you.
Hobby knives come with detachable blades that can be replaced. But I saw online someone show their method of sharpening hobby knives to extend the life of each blade. Let me see if I can try that method and post my results here.
Wile E. out.
#hobbystreak